Yes, it sounds good (and it’s what you did ;)).

Regards
JB

> Le 21 nov. 2020 à 15:42, Serge Huber <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> After analyzing a little more it's much simpler to finish the 1.5.3 release
> and do the 1.5.4 . I should have closed the votes earlier that was my
> mistake.
> 
> Regards,
>  Serge...
> 
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 3:40 PM Serge Huber <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Yes we could do that but all the artifacts are on 1.5.4 snapshot already.
>> At this point it's easier for me to release 1.5.3 than cancel it and
>> rebuild it. But you are right I didn't finish the process on 1.5.3 yet.
>> 
>> Any thoughts on this ?
>> 
>> Regards,
>>  Serge
>> 
>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 1:14 PM Francois Papon <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Serge,
>>> 
>>> May be we could cancel the 1.5.3 vote?
>>> 
>>> regards,
>>> 
>>> François
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> Le 20/11/2020 à 18:28, Serge Huber a écrit :
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> For your information, I'm working on the release of a version 1.5.4
>>> because
>>>> there were a lot of issues found with 1.5.3 and 1.5.2 due to the
>>> incomplete
>>>> implementation of the hardcoded property accessors.
>>>> 
>>>> I have added unit tests for all the reported problems.
>>>> 
>>>> I hope to have it ready either tonight or this week end for a vote.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>>  Serge...
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to