[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Schiefer updated UNOMI-483:
-------------------------------
Description:
The EventTypeRegistry that was recently added (awesome feature, by the way)
([https://github.com/apache/unomi/pull/236/files)] is currently keyed based on
the eventType string on the event coming in. Unfortunately, this will not work
with how we are using Unomi, thus preventing us from any future upgrades.
{{In our design, we use eventType as more of a "verb", so you can have the same
eventType string applying to multiple different sets of valid properties.}}
\{{ Example:}}
{\{ eventType target.itemType source.itemType}}
\{{ view page site}}
\{{ view survey page}}
\{{ view surveyQuestion survey}}
\{{ submit form page}}
\{{ submit survey page}}
\{{ submit surveyQuestion survey}}
I'm hoping that the EventTypeRegistry can be updated to allow for condition
based event matching, not just validation based on the eventType string
(perhaps falling back to the eventType mapping if no condition is set?).
Here is a contrived example of what I mean
/META-INF/cxs/events/submitSurvey.json
{
"type": "submitSurvey",
"condition": {
"type": "booleanCondition",
"parameterValues": {
"operator": "and",
"subConditions": [
{
"type": "eventTypeCondition",
"parameterValues": {
"eventTypeId": "submit"
}
},
{
"type": "eventPropertyCondition",
"parameterValues": {
"propertyName": "target.itemType",
"propertyValue": "survey",
"comparisonOperator": "equals"
}
}
]
}
},
"propertyTypes": [
{
"itemId": "target",
"type": "set",
"childPropertyTypes": [
{
"itemId": "itemId",
"type": "string"
},
{
"itemId": "properties",
"type": "set"
}
]
}
]
}
Thoughts?
was:
The EventTypeRegistry that was recently added (awesome feature, by the way)
([https://github.com/apache/unomi/pull/236/files)] is currently keyed based on
the eventType string on the event coming in. Unfortunately, this will not work
with how we are using Unomi, thus preventing us from any future upgrades.
{{In our design, we use eventType as more of a "verb", so you can have the same
eventType string applying to multiple different sets of valid properties.}}
\{{ Example:}}
{\{ eventType target.itemType source.itemType}}
\{{ view page site}}
\{{ view survey page}}
\{{ view surveyQuestion survey}}
\{{ submit form page}}
\{{ submit survey page}}
\{{ submit surveyQuestion survey}}
I'm hoping that the EventTypeRegistry can be updated to allow for condition
based event matching, not just validation based on the eventType string
(perhaps falling back to the eventType mapping if no condition is set?).
Here is a contrived example of what I mean
/META-INF/cxs/events/submitSurvey.json
{
"type": "submitSurvey",
"condition": {
"type": "booleanCondition",
"parameterValues": {
"operator": "and",
"subConditions": [
{
"type": "eventTypeCondition",
"parameterValues": {
"eventTypeId": "submit"
}
},
{
"type": "eventPropertyCondition",
"parameterValues": {
"propertyName": "target.itemType",
"propertyValue": "survey",
"comparisonOperator": "equals"
}
}
]
}
},
"propertyTypes": [
{
"itemId": "target",
"type": "set",
"childPropertyTypes": [
{
"itemId": "itemId",
"type": "string"
},
{
"itemId": "properties",
"type": "set"
}
]
}
]
}
Thoughts?
> EventTypeRegistry evaluating events based upon event condition
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UNOMI-483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-483
> Project: Apache Unomi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.5.5
> Reporter: Ben Schiefer
> Priority: Major
>
> The EventTypeRegistry that was recently added (awesome feature, by the way)
> ([https://github.com/apache/unomi/pull/236/files)] is currently keyed based
> on the eventType string on the event coming in. Unfortunately, this will not
> work with how we are using Unomi, thus preventing us from any future upgrades.
>
> {{In our design, we use eventType as more of a "verb", so you can have the
> same eventType string applying to multiple different sets of valid
> properties.}}
> \{{ Example:}}
> {\{ eventType target.itemType source.itemType}}
> \{{ view page site}}
> \{{ view survey page}}
> \{{ view surveyQuestion survey}}
> \{{ submit form page}}
> \{{ submit survey page}}
> \{{ submit surveyQuestion survey}}
> I'm hoping that the EventTypeRegistry can be updated to allow for condition
> based event matching, not just validation based on the eventType string
> (perhaps falling back to the eventType mapping if no condition is set?).
> Here is a contrived example of what I mean
> /META-INF/cxs/events/submitSurvey.json
>
>
> {
> "type": "submitSurvey",
> "condition": {
> "type": "booleanCondition",
> "parameterValues": {
> "operator": "and",
> "subConditions": [
> {
> "type": "eventTypeCondition",
> "parameterValues": {
> "eventTypeId": "submit"
> }
> },
> {
> "type": "eventPropertyCondition",
> "parameterValues": {
> "propertyName": "target.itemType",
> "propertyValue": "survey",
> "comparisonOperator": "equals"
> }
> }
> ]
> }
> },
> "propertyTypes": [
> {
> "itemId": "target",
> "type": "set",
> "childPropertyTypes": [
> {
> "itemId": "itemId",
> "type": "string"
> },
> {
> "itemId": "properties",
> "type": "set"
> }
> ]
> }
> ]
> }
> Thoughts?
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
