I mean that if a release should be cut fast (to fix a bug, etc) that in the vote thread we should inform the community that we are moving fast. I think it’s always good to give time for review : look what happened with the found bug. The release could have been canceled and resubmitted. But now it’s too late, we have to vote for a new release.
My €0.01 ;) Thanks Regards JB Le jeu. 17 nov. 2022 à 11:51, Serge Huber <shu...@apache.org> a écrit : > Well the funny thing in software: we have just identified a bug that is > pretty annoying because it will generate invalid data in the profile when > merging (basically it duplicates the information for the control groups > after a merge), so I will probably prepare a 1.7.1 release since the 1.7.0 > has been pushed to Maven Central already (so we can't roll it back). The > idea of the new release is to minimize the number of people using 1.7.0 so > that we minimize the number of corrupted profiles to avoid having to do > complex migrations. > > So I'm taking this opportunity to say that if we could get votes in as > quickly as possible it would be much appreciated :) > > Kevan is working on a fix, hopefully it will be available today so I can > restart a release. > > cheers, > Serge... > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:53 AM Francois Papon < > francois.pa...@openobject.fr> wrote: > > > Thanks Serge for the explanation, it's fine for me. > > > > regards, > > > > Francois > > > > On 17/11/2022 10:51, Serge Huber wrote: > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > You mean a note that the vote should be done quickly ? Yes I could > > > definitely do that. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Serge... > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Serge, > > >> > > >> That's fine, but maybe just a note in the vote thread would be good. > > >> Just to avoid surprises :) > > >> Especially when all binding votes come from the same "affiliated" PMC > > >> members. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Regards > > >> JB > > >> > > >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:44 AM Serge Huber <shu...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>> Hi guys, > > >>> > > >>> Sorry I did go a bit fast on this one, mostly because I want to also > > >>> release 2.x just after and was trying to fit everything this week :) > > >>> > > >>> I'll leave the vote open for 2.x longer. > > >>> > > >>> 1.x is also now a maintenance release so the changes are minor. > > >>> > > >>> But it is my understanding that there is no obligation to leave a > vote > > >> open > > >>> for a certain amount of time (it's a SHOULD), only that we be > inclusive > > >> ? I > > >>> do realize I did the vote pretty late last night but I was actually > > late > > >> in > > >>> finishing it that's why :) > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Serge... > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net > > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi Serge, > > >>>> > > >>>> Ouch, it's short to have the chance to vote :) > > >>>> > > >>>> Fair enough, you have 3 binding votes, but it would be great to > have a > > >>>> chance to review the release anyway. > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards > > >>>> JB > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:47 AM Serge Huber <shu...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>>>> Hi, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thank you for your votes. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Here's the summary : > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 3 binding votes +1: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> David Griffon > > >>>>> Kevan Jahanshahi > > >>>>> Serge Huber > > >>>>> > > >>>>> No 0 or -1. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The proposal to release Unomi 1.7.0 is approved by the team. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> John Doe 1 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:19 AM Serge Huber <shu...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>> Here's my +1 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 8:40 AM Kevan Jahanshahi < > > >> jke...@apache.org> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 2022/11/16 20:13:57 Serge Huber wrote: > > >>>>>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.7.0 release to your vote. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Please check the release notes for the details of this minor > > >> release > > >>>>>>>> Staging Repository: > > >>>>>>>> * > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1037/ > > >>>>>>>> < > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1037/ > > >* > > >>>>>>>> You can find the sources here : > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> * > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1037/org/apache/ > > >>>>>>>> unomi/unomi-root/1.7.0/unomi-root-1.7.0-source-release.zip > > >>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1037/org/apache/ > > >>>>>>>> unomi/unomi-root/1.7.0/unomi-root-1.7.0-source-release.zip>* > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Convenience binaries are also available here: > > >>>>>>>> * > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1037/org/apache/ > > >>>>>>>> unomi/unomi/1.7.0/ > > >>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1037/org/apache/ > > >>>>>>>> unomi/unomi/1.7.0/>* > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Git tag: > > >>>>>>>> unomi-root-1.7.0 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Release Notes: > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319220&version=12352323 > > >>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release > > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific > > >> comments) > > >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours, or until the > > >> necessary > > >>>>>>> number > > >>>>>>>> of binding votes (3 +1) is reached. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>> > > >
