[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15119278#comment-15119278
]
Serge Huber commented on UNOMI-8:
---------------------------------
2. (good to fix): the NOTICE file can be improved cleaned up:
- NOTICE has extra information. There is no need to add anything to NOTICE for
MIT license software [1] or (usually) for Apache licensed software. [2] NOTICE
needs to be keep small. [7]
- NOTICE may be missing information. Hyperic Sigar contains a NOTICE file
(which incorrectly lists MIT and Apache software). [12] It may be that some of
these notices need to be added to NOTICE or LICENSE. [11]
3. We should:
- place artefacts in correct release area (dist.apache.org, not a big deal)
- no need for need for KEYS file inside artefact and in fact at that point it's
too late to be of any real use.
- year is wrong in NOTICE file
Also for the binary convenience release:
- It is missing DISCLAIMER
- LICENSE and NOTICE are incorrect as:
- NOTICE lists BSD and MIT software which should be in LICENSE
- LICENSE is missing BSD/MIT and other bundled software
- NOTICE includes software that is not bundled (e.g. junit + others)
- NOTICE is probably missing item from bundled Apache license NOTICE files
(e.g.karaf + others) [13]
> Check legal files in preparation for the release
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UNOMI-8
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-8
> Project: Apache Unomi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Fix For: 1.0.0-incubating
>
>
> Guidance:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
