+1 on my side as well.

> On 08 Apr 2016, at 11:39, Thomas Draier <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was thinking of some possible improvements on the condition types, to
> make them more flexible.
> Currently, condition types are defined in unomi plugins - they are read
> from a json inside a plugin bundle, and then loaded into memory. Some of
> the base conditions rely on actual java code, so it make sense to put them
> into a bundle - but other some other conditions are only simple combination
> of other conditions, and are usually very specific to a domain. An end user
> may want to create his own condition using simple JSON definition, and may
> not want to develop and deploy a bundle just for that. It would be nice to
> be able to add new condition types by simply using REST API.
> If you look at the pageViewEventCondition - it is only based on simple
> boolean and property conditions, and is very specific to the type of events
> that will be sent by a third party server. They should get out of default
> unomi installation, and rather be created directly by the server that will
> send these events.
> Allowing to create/edit conditions will of course require to persist them,
> and so require some changes in the ConditionType object, changing from
> "PluginType" to "Item", and the way they are read by the definitions
> service.
> What do you think ?
> thomas

Christophe Laprun
Senior Software Engineer

8 rue du Sentier | 75002 Paris | France
jahia.com <http://www.jahia.com/>
SKYPE <skype:chris.laprun?add> | LINKEDIN 
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrislaprun> | TWITTER 
<https://twitter.com/metacosm> | VCARD 
<http://www.jahia.com/vcard/LaprunChristophe.vcf>

> JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/> to evaluate, get trained and to 
> discover why Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for Digital 
> Transformation.

Reply via email to