[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15239593#comment-15239593
]
Thomas Draier commented on UNOMI-23:
------------------------------------
It's now possible to create custom conditions :
curl -H "Content-Type: application/json" --user karaf:karaf -XPOST
'http://localhost:8181/cxs/definitions/conditions' -d '
{
"metadata": {
"id": "toto-condition",
"name": "toto-condition",
"description": "",
"tags": [
"demographic",
"profileCondition"
],
"readOnly": true
},
"parentCondition": {
"type": "profilePropertyCondition",
"parameterValues": {
"propertyName": "properties.firstName",
"propertyValue": "toto",
"comparisonOperator": "equals"
}
},
"parameters": [
]
}
'
> Allows to dynamically add custom conditions
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UNOMI-23
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-23
> Project: Apache Unomi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Thomas Draier
> Assignee: Thomas Draier
>
> I was thinking of some possible improvements on the condition types, to make
> them more flexible.
> Currently, condition types are defined in unomi plugins - they are read from
> a json inside a plugin bundle, and then loaded into memory. Some of the base
> conditions rely on actual java code, so it make sense to put them into a
> bundle - but other some other conditions are only simple combination of other
> conditions, and are usually very specific to a domain. An end user may want
> to create his own condition using simple JSON definition, and may not want to
> develop and deploy a bundle just for that. It would be nice to be able to add
> new condition types by simply using REST API.
> If you look at the pageViewEventCondition - it is only based on simple
> boolean and property conditions, and is very specific to the type of events
> that will be sent by a third party server. They should get out of default
> unomi installation, and rather be created directly by the server that will
> send these events.
> Allowing to create/edit conditions will of course require to persist them,
> and so require some changes in the ConditionType object, changing from
> "PluginType" to "Item", and the way they are read by the definitions service.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
