Sounds good but why not call the branch "1.0" -- seems less confusing, at least to me.
Dave On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:19 PM Todd Nine <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > Our 1.x development has slowed to patches only. Our 2.0 is under heavy > development and deployment. Rather than continue to keep 1.x on master, I > propose we rename "master" to "one-dot-oh", and rename "two-dot-o-dev" to > "master", future 2.x releases will come from the master branch. > > I propose I make this change on 2015-09-23 @ 19:00 MST, and confirm on the > dev list when complete. > > Thoughts? >
