Hi, Can you please try dev-subscribe@ and I'll try and mod you through? Ta Lewis
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Shaozhuang Liu <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > any idea why this ? > seems my address has been put into spam list or something? > > ################################################################################################################## > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following > addresses. > This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <dev@usergrid.incubator.apache.org>: > 192.87.106.230 failed after I sent the message. > Remote host said: 552 spam score (5.8) exceeded threshold > (FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_LOCALHOST,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,WEIRD_PORT > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <st...@apache.org> > Received: (qmail 82682 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2013 15:57:17 -0000 > Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) > (140.211.11.9) > by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:57:17 > +0000 > Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.1.155]) (127.0.0.1) > (smtp-auth username stliu, mechanism plain) > by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 > 15:57:17 +0000 > From: Shaozhuang Liu <st...@apache.org> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Apple-Mail=_0FC75B40-1F39-473F-A4D6-F04F4A4A6417" > Subject: error when building website locally > Message-Id: <22c55d7a-c05d-4568-98ef-ef5986946...@apache.org> > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:57:13 +0800 > To: "dev@usergrid.incubator.apache.org" <dev@usergrid.incubator.apache.org > > > Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\)) > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812) > > > ################################################################################################################## > > ------------------------- > Best Regards, > > Strong Liu <stliu at hibernate.org> > http://about.me/stliu/bio > > On 2013Nov 19, at 1:26 AM, Tim Anglade <timangl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Good to know. I wasn't aware that “Release Candidate” carried a > particular meaning at the ASF, although in retrospect that should have been > obvious. What should this tag be called, if anything? > > > > On Monday, November 18, 2013, Jake Farrell wrote: > > Hey Tim > > +1 to getting the code imported so people can start submitting patches > and > > helping work on it. > > > > "In light of recent conversations" - There have been no conversations on > > the any of the mailing lists up to this initial import email, please make > > sure conversations regarding releases are carried out on the mailing > lists. > > > > -1 to trying to tag an Apache release candidate out of this initial > import > > in its currently state due to the following issues > > > > * No Apache license header on any files > > * Missing NOTICES file > > * The namespace are still org.usergrid > > * No artifact provided and no signatures > > > > Please see http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html and > > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html for additional > details > > that should be in place before proposing a release candidate. > > > > -Jake > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Tim Anglade <timangl...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > (cc’ing all committers on their personal address; if you have not done > so, > > > please subscribe to the Apache Usergrid dev list: > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-usergrid-dev/) > > > > > > > > > Hi all, I’d like to propose the following tag as the basis for our > initial > > > “code drop” to the Apache Software Foundation. > > > > > > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid/tree/v1.0-rc1 > > > > > > In light of recent conversations I further propose that we tag a > release > > > matching our eventual code drop, and that that eventual release be > numbered > > > 1.0 (hence the “v1.0-rc1” label for this release candidate). > > > > > > I propose an initial 72-hour window for discussion on this release > > > candidate. If all matters are resolved by then Dave J. has offered go > ahead > > > and submit this release as our official code drop for entry into the > Apache > > > Incubator. At that time, Apigee will proceed and close down its old > > > repositories. > > > > > > > > > Additional notes > > > 1. This new repository is a git subtree merge of 12 distinct > repositories > > > developed previously under the “apigee” or “scottganyo” accounts on > github. > > > For full details of what has been merged see the release notes: > > > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid/releases/tag/v1.0-rc1 > > > 2. The merge preserves full history for all files despite their > relocation > > > (e.g. > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid/commits/master/stack/README.md > > > ). > > > 3. I added instructions in the root README on how to upgrade your > personal > > > code setup and pull in work you may have had on a personal fork that > was > > > not merged in the new repo yet: > > > > > > > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid#how-to-update-your-code-setup--pull-changes-from-your-old-forks > > > 4. If need be, you can also pull changes from this new repo into your > old > > > forks: > > > > > > > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid#how-to-pull-commits-made-on-this-repo-into-your-old-forks > > > 5. For a limited time, I volunteer to maintain asynchronous branches > > > matching each previous repository (e.g. > > > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid/tree/portal, > > > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid/tree/sdks/ios, etc.). These have > the > > > advantage of being immediately compatible with the old independent repo > > > (i.e. you can push/pull your old fork of apigee/usergrid-portal > directly on > > > the “portal” branch of usergrid/usergrid). > > > 6. I recommend we support items #4 and #5 for a limited time only and > > > strongly encourage all interested contributors to upgrade their setup > per > > > the instructions in item #3. > > > > > -- *Lewis*
