Thanks for the quick turn around and attention on this Tim, greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work
-Jake On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Tim Anglade <[email protected]> wrote: > All points should be addressed now. I added instructions on how to update > the website in its README [1]. I also cleaned various other little things, > including listing Alex Karasulu as a committer. > > Cheers! --Tim > > [1]: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/usergrid/site/README.md > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Jake Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Recently there has been a lot of discussions about issues seen in releases >> and tagging as well as concerns raised about podlings learning the ASF >> ways. As we continue to progress towards the first Apache Usergrid release >> and eventually graduation I want to make sure that everyone is on the same >> page and aware of the ASF requirements and necessary procedures that are >> in >> place. >> >> Looking at the Usergrid website and docs we have some items that will need >> to be addressed before the next report is due and the status for each of >> these items should be added to the report. >> >> 1. The website has a recent releases section and download links. No votes >> have taken place so far for Apache UserGrid and therefore no release have >> occurred. The links point to github for the available downloads. Releases >> must be voted on and then accepted be the IPMC as the project is still in >> incubation and the releases must be distributed using the ASF mirror >> system >> . These must be removed. Everyone please familiarize yourself with the >> guide for releases [1][2]. If you have any questions on this please ask, >> everyone needs to be aware of these requirements as they are not optional. >> >> 2. There is no documentation about the github workflow the project opted >> to >> go with. Going to the website and clicking on contributing guidelines send >> you to [3] where it references submitting pull requests to >> apigee/usergrid-stack. The workflow that has been selected is different >> than Apache JClouds and any other project in the incubator or any TLP. >> JClouds is using Github for reviews only and no source is committed to >> their Github repository [4]. This process needs to be documented throughly >> to ensure that the committers are following all required ASF legal >> obligations for any contributions. >> >> 3. The website does not meet the required ASF branding guidelines [5]. >> This >> was initially brought up in the beginning of January and still is an >> issue. >> >> There is a lot of hard work going on and I appreciate everyone working to >> help address these items to ensure that all ASF requirements and policies >> are being adhered to. If anyone has any questions on these please do not >> hesitate to ask >> >> -Jake >> >> >> [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html >> [2]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >> [3]: https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid/tree/master/stack#contributing >> [4]: http://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Committers%20Guide >> [5]: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#websites >> > >
