Hey Dave This was my concern and the overhead that I am referencing for secretary@to file those ICLAs for people that might make a 2 line change and never contribute again.
As Lewis mentioned, typically ICLAs are only filed for new committers and not for every contributor. Contributions need to have a clear grant of use to the ASF which can be done via attaching as a patch to a JIRA issue or being sent to one of the project mailing lists like the dev@ list. Please take a look at the new GitHub integrations that we have been working on from the infra side and if there are still blockers for UserGrid using this then I would love to work with you on resolving those issues (contributions are also always welcome here) https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and -Jake On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > Jake and other mentors: > > Below is an example of a two-line change in the form of a Pull Request. > Asking the contributor to file an ICLA seems pretty annoying. > > https://github.com/usergrid/usergrid/pull/63/files > > Do we have to have an ICLA on file for tiny changes like this? If not, what > is the rule for deciding when a change is large enough to require an ICLA? > > - Dave > > > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi team, > > > > This is just a friendly reminder to be vigilant about our Individual > > Contributor License Agreement (ICLA) process. > > > > Committers: before you accept a PR against Usergrid on Github you must > > ensure that the person submitting the PR has sent a signed ICLA form to > the > > ASF. > > > > Here is the form: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt > > > > Here's how you can check if a person has an ICLA on file. The page below > > has a list of all ASF committers and below that, those who have submitted > > ICLA forms to the foundation (in the "Unlisted CLAs" section): > > > > http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > > > > Thanks, > > Dave > > > > >
