hehe, never mind :D really like your suggestion, and reading your slides now, thanks very much.
On Apr 9, 2014, at 21:59, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 9, 2014, Shaozhuang Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I guess you mean the Jersey 2 work from me? :D > > > I am so sorry, and wow do I feel dumb. > > I mean to say the amazing contribution from Strong Liu! > > See also: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-103 > > Thanks, > - Dave > > > > > >> On Apr 9, 2014, at 21:45, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> After my Usergrid talk at ApacheCon a couple of us Usergridlers started >>> talking about how to get a first release out. Here's a summary of what >> we >>> talked about. >>> >>> The discussion started with the question: should we release what we have >>> now in master as a "1.0" release or should we wait for the "two-dot-o" >>> branch to be merged into master. After some discussion we arrived at the >>> conclusion that the "two-dot-o" branch is not really Usergrid 2.0. >> Instead >>> it is really just a new feature -- a new "Core Persistence" >> implementation >>> of the existing Entity Manager interface, one that can be turned on and >> off >>> via configuration. >>> >>> We should rename the two-dot-o branch to something that reflects the fact >>> that is is essentially a new feature, perhaps we should call it >>> "core-persistence" or something like that. >>> >>> More importantly, we should not hold-up our first Apache release by >> waiting >>> for the new "Core Persistence" feature to be complete. And, we definitely >>> should not force amazing contributions like Sungju's Jersey 2 work to be >>> merged into the Core Persistence branch. Sungju's work should go into >>> master and we should work to get a first release done from the master >>> branch as soon as possible, regardless of the work on the new "Core >>> Persistence" engine. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> - Dave >> >>
