Rod, I would recommend always leaning towards the safe side. The general consensus on the general@ list is that the CCLA isn't a replacement SGA, so including everything in it is the best.
John On Sat Feb 14 2015 at 10:33:57 AM Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > > Can you clarify if we need to include all the modules in the new SGA (e.g. > including the stack), or if the new SGA should only include the things that > were not in the original grant (SDKs, ugh, portal). > > Thanks! > > Rod > > -- > *Rod Simpson* > T @rockerston > W rodsimpson.com > > On January 25, 2015 at 8:23:46 AM, John D. Ament ([email protected]) > wrote: > > Lewis, > > On Sat Jan 24 2015 at 11:11:17 PM Lewis John Mcgibbney < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:50 AM, < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Let me clarify a bit. I do apologize for being a bit brief on my > > response, > > > I just had ankle surgery and am not feeling that great afterwards :/ > > > > > > > All the best with recovery John. > > > > > > > > > > To be honest, I think Usergrid is about 75% there. > > > > > > +1, I would say more than that. There is a solid community here. That is > > the most important thing for me to be honest. The initial group of > > committers have done a sterling job of promoting UG at every given > > opportunity. > > > > > > > I think if we clear up > > > the administrative stuff we can get very close towards graduation, > > > > > > This is true John. We have some issues to have addressed on the link > below. > > I will make best efforts to track the intricacies down and see if we can > > get them flushed out to the page. > > > > > > > but I > > > think having one more release, which is completely clean, will be that > > true > > > proof the podling's ready to rock. > > > > > > > Another release would be fantastic. I think the podling has proved that > > release managers are available, keen and willing to stand up to the job. > > This ticks the release box for me and I am not concerned about Usergrids > > ability to produce releases. > > Further on this point, from the initial proposal document > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/UsergridProposal > > > > - Move the existing code base to Apache CHECK > > - Integrate with the Apache development process CHECK > > - Ensure all dependencies are compliant with Apache License 2.0 CHECK > > - Set up open-source docs and website CHECK > > - Incremental development and releases per Apache Guidelines CHECK > > > > > Well, technically we're still struggling w/ bullet 3. As Justin pointed > out, we still have some issues w/ our notice and license files. > > Specifically where I'm concerned is under "Weak Copy-left" from here > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html (CDDL license specifically) > > The issues with one of the files was exactly what this calls out and just > makes me nervous to say there is no other in the source base. Obviously > the easiest way to ensure it doesn't exist any longer is to remove the > dependencies from the code base but that's a pretty large effort. > > At some point we should plan to go file by file and make sure it's not > questionable. There are some questionable files I see in launcher that use > a very odd format, not quite the format I see in the rest of the code > base. The fact that they don't use imports and everything is the FQCN > makes me think it came from elsewhere. > > > > > > > > > What needs to be updated on here? > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/usergrid.html > > > > > > - Podling Name Search - since Apigee donated Usergrid, I'm assuming > > Apigee > > > has already signed over the name to the ASF. Do we have record of this > > > somewhere? > > > > > > > Mmmmm. This is fuzzy right now. The initial proposal adds no value here > > either. If we cannot get formal verification that this has taken place > down > > at Apigee then I think we should kick off a podling name search > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html#search > > > > > At this point, I've started on some of the leg work around this. It's > obviously looking good at this point (the platform's been around long > enough that the only similar term showing up is "a list of users within a > grid" > > > > > > > > > > - If you have a full list of committers at this point, we should make > > sure > > > the page gets updated with everyones username. > > > > > > > Where on minotaur can I locate this info. Do you know? I will flush it > out. > > > > > Ha. I've found this to be a pain. When committers get added they're put > into the "incubator" group - we don't create ldap groups for podlings. > > What I think would be easiest is to just run through the mail archives and > see whenever someone's been voted in as a committer, make sure they've > filed an ICLA and actually created an apache id. I've dealt with a podling > a while ago where they voted tons of people in as committers - I think > upwards of 40 people. Of those 40, 8 actually went through the process of > signing up with Apache. > > Ultimately, when creating the TLP resolution we should only list out > active > committers, people who haven't contributed during incubation should be > very > carefully looked at. > > John > > > > > > > > > > - Dates are important for many of these sections. It seems to me like > > much > > > of this is complete, but I personally don't know the dates in which it > > > occurred. We should make sure those get updated. > > > > > > > ACK. > > > >
