Nathan,

Nathan Bubna wrote:
> On 10/30/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nathan,
>>
>> Nathan Bubna wrote:
>>> hmm.  i haven't run a full "ant test" on the trunk lately, though "ant
>>> test.generic" worked recently when i checked in the RenderTool fix.
>>> i'll try it out.  probably something broken.  i've been pretty focused
>>> on 2.x lately.
>>
>> Er... should I be working in a branch and not on the trunk? I didn't
>> know that's what you guys did.
> 
> basically, the trunk is currently the 1.x branch.  2.x development
> happens inn branches\2.x\

D'oh. I didn't know.

>> Let me know if I need to re-submit my patch.
> 
> if you want to create a 2.x version of the patch, i'll use that.
> otherwise, i can just hand port the code.  doesn't matter to me.

Okay. The code is easy enough to port. In fact, it will probably be 100%
patchable unless you have modified that class for other reasons (I can't
see why).

-chris


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to