[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540435
 ] 

Claude Brisson commented on VELTOOLS-69:
----------------------------------------

I have some time to work on it, so let's say I take care of it.

> ValueParserSub generic getter never worked
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VELTOOLS-69
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-69
>             Project: Velocity Tools
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: VelocityView
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Claude Brisson
>             Fix For: 1.3
>
>         Attachments: valueparser.patch
>
>
> (I attach this issue to the VelocityView component but we may need a Generic 
> component in Jira)
> When $query is the ValueParser object for the query string http://...?foo=5,
> then $query.foo.int is an invalid reference.
> Why? Because there is a collision of variable names in 
> ValueParserSub.get(Object key).
> I profit of this opportunity to state that I really don't like the 
> ValueParserSub class, because it breaks the "#if($query.foo)" syntax. Hence, 
> it is not backward compatible. Or at least, it could return null for an 
> unexistant key.
> Is it really usefull to keep it now that Velocity handles conversions much 
> better? Since obviously nobody used the $query.foo.int feature, it is still 
> time to remove it... Also, since the need to convert between types can emerge 
> elsewhere, it would be much cleaner to have a standalone converter object. 
> Yes, we loose the syntax $query.foo.int, but is it that nice a syntax?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to