On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le mercredi 05 mars 2008 à 12:13 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit : #snip() > > interesting. seems like new ideas are starting to pop up. :) i have > > one i'm excited about, but i'm not quite ready to put it out there for > > community vetting. > > > > in any case, if we can't work some of these new ideas into 1.6 proper, > > it would be great to at least get them in 1.6's whiteboard at a very > > minimum to make it easier for people to start playing with them. > > Let's create the 1_7 branch, and we'll backport thinks that we managed > to do in the 1.6 before the release. It's subversion, it's not > subversive. It's merge, not submerge ;)
if you want to do it, go for it. i don't find it easy to manage two branches at once, but if you're going to take the lead in the effort, that's ok with me. > We could also create the 2_0 branch right away... heh. i'd never veto it. :) > > Agree? > > Claude > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
