Given the lack of affirmative response, i'm going to take some wild guesses here...
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Does anyone out there actually use custom implementations of the > IntrospectorCache interface? nope. > 2) Does anyone use any IntrospectorCacheListeners? no. > 3) Can anyone give me a use-case for IntrospectorCacheListeners? (Henning?) yes, Henning, who is busy with other things. Henning, if you would like these back, i'll replace them then. for now, i'm yanking them. :) > > For those curious about my reasons for asking: i'm looking at > IntrospectorBase and the classes above and seeing slight risk of > ConcurrentModificationExceptions in the way listeners are handled. > This would be trivially fixed by synchronizing the add/removeListener > methods. However, i'm hoping to use more fine-grained synchronization > in those classes that would require potentially more hassle than the > risk. Loads of fun, ya know. So, if i find out the listeners are > used w/o problems, i won't worry about it. If i find out they're not > used at all and can't figure out what they're good for, then i would > happily be rid of them. :) > > all input is welcome! > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
