On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice list. > > I'll try and take a look at 553, 525, and maybe the parser 587. (I've had > luck with tricky parser stuff in the past).
that would be great! > What's the legal problem with 603? It's just a text suggestion-- can't we > just make the change? oops. that should have been 229: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-229 > Re: 437. I'm not sure I get it. It seems redundant with > ReferenceInsertionEvent. yes, there's a lot of overlap. i like the possibilities of this approach better, though honestly, i have as little motivation to work on that as i have had to work on/use event handlers (which isn't much). really, without some refinement and championing, this is unlikely to happen. > WILL > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Below is the list of outstanding issues targeted for Velocity 1.6 and >> my take on their priority. As you'll notice, i think there are only a >> few more that really ought to have some attention before we do a final >> 1. 6 release. I am going to try and roll a test build out tonight >> that can hopefully become 1.6-beta1. After that is out, i hope to >> make time to look into the context scoping problems (62/532) soon. >> The other three "should" issues below would probably be better >> addressed by someone else. Will, 553 and 525 seem more up your alley; >> do you think you'll have any time to deal with them in the near >> future? 587 seems like it might require parser attention; anyone >> interested in tackling it? >> >> Should probably try to resolve for 1.6 final: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-62 (bug) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-532 (bug, probably same as >> 62) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-553 (behavior refinement) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-525 (code cleanup) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-587 (bug) >> >> Would be nice to have for 1.6, but not worth holding things up: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-555 (long wanted feature) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-463/464 (new docs) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-513 (doc issue) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-406 (improved syntax) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-466 (build feature) >> >> Has problems: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-603 (legal hangup on >> patch) >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-437 (initial patch had >> problems, no followup patch yet) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Forio Business Simulations > > Will Glass-Husain > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.forio.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
