On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Byron Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, well if it means anything I would vote for 1. I think adding another > config option is contributing to option soup. And I think the majority of > users, even experienced users aren't really going to want to consider the > implications of strict pass by name. With 1) there is an option for those > who are really effected by 285.
The example with x1 and x2 and $x was helpful in understanding the problem. Could someone put option 1 and 2 in terms of how it would affect that example? -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
