[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651931#action_12651931
 ] 

Ezra Epstein commented on VELTOOLS-110:
---------------------------------------

Hmmm.   I didn't see it as either-or.  Rather one more Tool.  There were a few 
places (e.g., array index access, general Java operators) where I found myself 
reaching for Ognl.  Didn't bother to implement it - instead I extended the Java 
objects that I was putting into the Velocity Context.  Your call, of course.  I 
would just say I view it as one more option, not as something that removes the 
utility of the other tools.

> An OGNL Tool, perhaps
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: VELTOOLS-110
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-110
>             Project: Velocity Tools
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: GenericTools
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Ezra Epstein
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I've been using a combination of the Velocity Tools and it occurred to me 
> that much of the functionality is available via OGNL and so I was thinking 
> about writing an OGNL tool.  Then it occurred to me that, perhaps, the 
> V-Tools team hadn't yet checked out OGNL, so I'm dropping this note to 
> mention it.  Do check it out.  OGNL with the V Context as the root "this" 
> node, would be a very powerful tool.
> While on the subject of integrating with other things, I always wondered why 
> the VelocityContext doesn't implement the java.util.Map interface.  I know 
> that's part of the Velocity project not tools, but it's a curiosity for me.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to