[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12659885#action_12659885
 ] 

Jarkko Viinamäki commented on VELOCITY-661:
-------------------------------------------

I think Velocity should not interpret anything inside the literal directive. In 
fact, if you look at the documentation, that is the behaviour one  would 
naturally expect:

"the #literal script element allows the template designer to easily use large 
chunks of *uninterpreted* content in VTL code"
http://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel/user-guide.html#stringliterals

What would be an easy way to change the literal directive so that Velocity does 
not interpret anything inside it?

> Parsing errors on content inside #literal() #end block
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VELOCITY-661
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-661
>             Project: Velocity
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Engine
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.1
>         Environment: ALL
>            Reporter: ND
>
> I have some velocity templates that include quit some javascript. Inside the 
> javascript a javascrip template engine is used which also uses ${varname}
> Escaping each occurance would make the code rather unreable, so to prevent 
> velocity from parsing the javascript code, I put a #literal() around it.
> However, velocity still PARSES the contents of this block, which of course 
> results in parsing exceptions.
> My feeling with "literal" is that it is completely UNINTERPRETED content?
> This SHOULD work:
> #literal()
>  var myId = 'someID';
>  $('#test).append($.template('<div id="${myId}"></div>').apply({myId: myId}));
> #end

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to