[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12660618#action_12660618
]
Jarkko Viinamäki commented on VELOCITY-661:
-------------------------------------------
OTOH, I started to think how likely is it that some templates of existing
applications contain the "#% " pattern? This is more problematic than the end
token since this token starts the textblock and may break rendering.
So #%% %%# would be definitely a safer solution although it's longer and not so
pretty. Heh. So I ended up advocating both approaches. Technically both are
equally easy to implement and there should not be difference in performance
either.
I trust Nathan will make the right choice.
> Parsing errors on content inside #literal() #end block
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: VELOCITY-661
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-661
> Project: Velocity
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Engine
> Affects Versions: 1.6.1
> Environment: ALL
> Reporter: ND
> Attachments: velocity-661-v1.0.patch
>
>
> I have some velocity templates that include quit some javascript. Inside the
> javascript a javascrip template engine is used which also uses ${varname}
> Escaping each occurance would make the code rather unreable, so to prevent
> velocity from parsing the javascript code, I put a #literal() around it.
> However, velocity still PARSES the contents of this block, which of course
> results in parsing exceptions.
> My feeling with "literal" is that it is completely UNINTERPRETED content?
> This SHOULD work:
> #literal()
> var myId = 'someID';
> $('#test).append($.template('<div id="${myId}"></div>').apply({myId: myId}));
> #end
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
