Yes, since it is a fix for a regression, that'd great. Since there was also 666 and 668 around, it'd better if you do the merge, I'll take care of javacc.
Claude On mar, 2009-01-20 at 07:49 -0700, Byron Foster wrote: > Let me know if we should include the fix for VELOCITY-667 in 1.6.2, > I'll move the changes over to 1.6.2 branch if so... > > On Jan 18, 2009, at 13:46 , Claude Brisson wrote: > > > It's here : > > > > http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/engine/1.6.2/ > > > > I'll launch the vote in a few days if no one chimes in. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
