[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667438#action_12667438
]
Jarkko Viinamäki commented on VELOCITY-680:
-------------------------------------------
Nathan: "Perhaps we should consider a more extensible solution like
#set[scope]( $foo = 'bar' ) where scope is a string identifier for the scope in
which the reference should be set."
Agreed. Maybe we should name this directive as "setlocal" then? That way we
could avoid the potential clash with the old #local directive implementation.
> RFC: New #local directive that behaves like #set but puts things into local
> context in macro rendering
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: VELOCITY-680
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-680
> Project: Velocity
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 1.7
> Reporter: Jarkko Viinamäki
> Attachments: velocity-local-directive-1.1.patch,
> velocity-local-directive.patch
>
>
> It would be very useful to be able to set variables that are in local macro
> scope. That is, they do not overwrite "global" variables and are thrown away
> after macro rendering. This would allow people to build macro libraries that
> do not clash so easily with each other.
> There is some implementation of a "LocalDirective" in
> experimental/localdirective but I didn't quite get it and it doesn't follow
> the same syntax as #set. I used a few minutes to hack together this
> alternative implementation which behaves exactly like #set but it puts things
> in local context only.
> There's only one test case since this is Request-for-Comments type of patch.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
