--- On Fri, 5/15/09, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: tiles-velocity problem > To: "Velocity Developers List" <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 11:14 AM > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Matt > Benson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: tiles-velocity problem > >> To: "Velocity Developers List" <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 10:13 PM > >> Hmm. That would be a part of > >> Antonio's patch for VELTOOLS-116 that i > >> didn't take (it was unnecessary). Apparently he > kept > >> building > >> tiles-velocity against his own local version after > i > >> resolved that > >> issue. :( > >> > > > > Okay... I can prepare a patch for that on the > tiles-freemarker side; would anybody be willing to commit > it? > > Not until Tuesday at the earliest. Too much to do > today and Monday > already, and i don't have Tiles set up and building on this > machine, > so it would take a while. > Wanted to notify the list about snapshots while also pinging on this--the Tiles framework was pretty easy for me to check out and build ;) . Unfortunately since the build was broken when Wendy tried to deploy for me all the snapshot metadata is now hosed. Since the other snapshots out there are old and the 2.2.0 ones had to be deleted due to their being incomplete, I don't think there's any reason not to delete all of them. Thanks, Matt > > Thanks, > > Matt > > > >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Matt Benson > <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Apologies for the cross-post, but will > someone step > >> forward as the Velocity dev with whom Antonio was > working on > >> changes? There is code in tiles-velocity that > wants a > >> velocity-tools o.a.v.t.view.AbstractJeeConfigImpl > class that > >> appears to be missing. Does anybody know > anything about > >> such a beast, and where it may be hiding? > Would(n't) this > >> be a simple do-nothing implementation of the > JeeConfig > >> interface from the same class? > >> > > >> > TIA, > >> > Matt > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
