that is really cool.  any idea how they got that set up?  do you have
this for Tiles?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Antonio Petrelli
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Just another thing.
> I would like to help, but it's difficult to do it since the patch mechanism
> of Subversion is not perfect.
> Why don't you open a sandbox directory, open to all Apache committers, so I
> can "branch" the trunk and work on it?
> Maven team has already done it:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/The+Maven+Sandbox+is+for+all+Apache+Committers
> !
>
> Thanks
> Antonio
>
> 2009/10/10 Antonio Petrelli <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi all!
>> I noticed that Velocity 2.0 is still at snapshot level, it seems a lot of
>> time to me :-)
>> So I would like to ask: What's missing to release it?
>>
>> I took a look at the issues scheduled for 2.0:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310130&fixfor=12312884
>> I noticed that they are two:
>> * there is a pure documentation issue, that seems fixed (with the exception
>> of some alcohol-driven comments :-D )
>> * the other is an issue that is really easily fixed with Maven with the
>> release plugin.
>>
>> Moreover this issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-65
>> seems driven from prejudice against Maven, and the comment was from 2006, a
>> lot of things have changed.
>>
>> I think that the Maven move is easy, knowing what needs to be done. Since
>> the Ant build files are pretty big, I did not go too deep reading them. What
>> do they do?
>> I noticed that they:
>> * compile
>> * test
>> * make packages
>> Is there anything else?
>>
>> The only *small* problem is with the tests. I managed to execute tests
>> under Maven, see:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-122
>> There is only *one* test that I am not able to execute, since it needs a
>> container, i.e. it is an integration test and it needs, essentially, a web
>> project (correct me if I am wrong).
>> Is it the case to exclude the Maven path for merely a single *integration*
>> test?
>>
>> Thanks for your attention
>> Antonio
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to