+1 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Claude Brisson <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1, as long as there is a sustained effort in documenting everything > > Claude > > On mer., 2010-06-09 at 07:53 -0700, Nathan Bubna wrote: > > Ok, +1 > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2010/6/9 Nathan Bubna <[email protected]>: > > >> Not all of us are familiar with this. Could you explain the benefits? > > > > > > The benefit is that staging Maven artifacts is no more a problem, > > > since Nexus (professional edition) allows an easy promotion to the > > > main repository. > > > The main Apache pom contains most of the configuration needed to > > > deploy artifacts correctly. > > > And this is the standard at Apache now. > > > > > >> And would this entail abandoning our Ant release process for Maven? > > > > > > No, the binaries will be uploaded in people.apache.org, only Maven > > > artifacts are interested. Moreover, Nexus has a nice "Staging upload" > > > feature, that allows to upload Maven artifacts in a staging > > > repository, to allow the vote process. > > > > > > Antonio > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
