On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[email protected]> wrote: > I changed the subject for clarity. > > 2010/7/1 "Marinó A. Jónsson" <[email protected]>: >> Just noticed you're going ahead with the change from velocity-log-{lib} to >> velocity-engine-{lib} - I believe, seeing as the uberjar will be packaged >> for ant users, that the original naming of velocity-log-{lib} actually makes >> more sense to us maven users :) > > At this point I don't know: velocity-log-{lib} implies the existence > of "velocity-log" module. > Either we create such a module, containing LogChute and simple > implementations, or stick with velocity-engine-{lib}. > > Thoughts?
mere name concerns seems a poor reason to make another separate module > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
