+1
built and tested with ant 1.7.1 and java 1.6.0_10 under ubuntu
I think that we sould explicitely state, when we publish it, that it is
a transitionnal release towards the next to come 2.0 features, meant to
hightlight deprecated syntaxic constructs (even if it corrects a few
other things). I mean, users should just be aware of the fact that if
they do a drop-in replacement, their logs will be filled with
deprecation warnings. Or is there any way to hide them? I didn't check...
Claude
On 25/11/2010 05:23, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Ok, no complaints about this build. If you haven't tested it yet (but
you did, right? :), here's the link:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.7/
Please vote on whether to release this as GA:
[ ] +1 Let's do it
[ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care.
[ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you.
[ ] -1 No, because __________________
If we have the necessary votes, i will close the vote Sunday (Nov 28),
around dinnertime PST. if not, well, we'll cross that when i come to it.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Nathan Bubna<[email protected]> wrote:
Ok, here is another test build, this time without cruft from my old dev setup:
http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.7/
Please give it a look and report any issues ASAP. :)
I'll call for a vote at some point next week. With luck, i can push a
release on the 28th or 29th.
Thanks for your help!
(note: still based on revision 1035365 in the trunk)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:[email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail:[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
