Ah - certainly not. But replying as I'm doing it right now on the dev list should be enough, I guess.
Claude On Tue, 22 May 2012 07:27:50 -0700 Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm. It also wants a link to the vote, but is private@ archived > anywhere? > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ok, so he does have a CLA on file already. Do we know what > > username he wants? > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Claude Brisson > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ah, good news! I was gonna re-launch it again. Hopefully I didn't > >> put any deadline. > >> > >> 3 +1 (Nathan Bubna, Will Glass-Husain and Claude Brisson) > >> > >> no 0 or -1 > >> > >> The next step is for Nathan, only the PMC Chair has enough karma. > >> > >> I think we can ask for a limited access, I mean to give Dishara > >> write access only to > >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/velocity/sandbox/jsr223 > >> > >> but if it's not possible we'll only ask him to stick to it. > >> > >> > >> Claude > >> > >> On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:38:21 -0700 > >> Will Glass-Husain <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> For some reason I missed this vote. A late +1. > >>> > >>> WILL > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Claude Brisson > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > We still lack at least one vote here. > >>> > > >>> > I'd be nice to manifest yourself even if you don't feel directly > >>> > concerned... > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Claude > >>> > > >>> > On Sat, 5 May 2012 09:23:21 -0700 > >>> > Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > +1 > >>> > > > >>> > > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Claude Brisson > >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > > Hi all, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Dishara Wijewardana is going to work all the summer as a > >>> > > > GSOC student to implement a JSR 223 wrapper for Velocity > >>> > > > (this will let users call the Velocity engine using the > >>> > > > standardized Java scripting interface). > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I think that the easiest way to proceed is to give him > >>> > > > commit access, and have him work in a specific branch. > >>> > > > Otherwise, it'll be more work for him to generate patches > >>> > > > and for us to apply them so as to follow his work. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > [] +1 Yes, let Dishara be a commiter > >>> > > > [] +/-0 Not sure, here's why: ... > >>> > > > [] -1 No. Because ... > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I vote +1. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > FYI, he already sent his CLA (directly to > >>> > > > [email protected] with me in cc, maybe I'll have to send > >>> > > > it again along with the new committer request, I'm not an > >>> > > > expert on this procedure...). > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Claude > >>> > > > > >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>> > > > [email protected] For additional > >>> > > > commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>> > > [email protected] For additional > >>> > > commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: > >>> > [email protected] > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
