Do you think we need to open issues for trivial obviously-broken build
issues like this?

I'm going to guess no.

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu.dumit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1.7 is definitely wrong, since a non -SNAPSHOT version should only be
> present in a tagged release. So yes, that needs to be changed.
>
> On 06/02/2015 10:52 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> My maven knowledge is tragically small.
>> Do we need to make the following change for the 1.x pom.xml?
>>
>> Index: pom.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- pom.xml    (revision 1683209)
>> +++ pom.xml    (working copy)
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>>
>>    <groupId>org.apache.velocity</groupId>
>>    <artifactId>velocity</artifactId>
>> -  <version>1.7</version>
>> +  <version>1.8-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>
>>    <name>Apache Velocity</name>
>>    <url>http://velocity.apache.org/engine/devel/</url>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergiu Dumitriu
> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org

Reply via email to