Hi,

I have merged the changes from master in the pull request [1]. I would soon
add the tests.

[1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/55

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
Riyafa

On 10 June 2016 at 09:07, Preston Carman <[email protected]> wrote:

> The array constructor patch has been merged with master.
>
> Riyafa, Please rebase/merge your branch with master. You will also
> find an example test query Christina set up. You can use this as
> starting point to add your object query tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Preston
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Christina Pavlopoulou <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made some further changes to the array runtime constructor and I added
> > some test cases for it [1]. I, also, added a framework for Riyafa's test
> > cases for the object. The test cases that I added consist of the
> following 4
> > cases:
> >
> > 1. an array with a single item
> > 2. an array with a sequence of items
> > 3. an array with nested arrays
> > 4. an empty array
> >
> > All the tests run and print the correct results.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/54
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Christina
> >
> > On 06/09/2016 07:25 AM, Till Westmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I’ve also just added a few comments here.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Till
> >>
> >> On 8 Jun 2016, at 21:20, Christina Pavlopoulou wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I implemented the array runtime constructor and the printer and it
> looks
> >>> to print correctly. The code is here [1]
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/52
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>> Christina
> >>>
> >>> On 06/07/2016 05:05 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Riyafa,
> >>>>
> >>>> this looks very good!
> >>>> I’ve added a few comments on improvements and generalizations, but we
> >>>> are
> >>>> mostly there.
> >>>> Once you've addressed my comments we should also be able to use
> >>>> constructors
> >>>> like
> >>>>
> >>>>     { "a": xs:date("2016-06-07"), "b": 2 }
> >>>>
> >>>> Wrt the test, I think that we should create a new test catalog similar
> >>>> to
> >>>>
> >>>>     ./vxquery-xtest/src/test/resources/VXQueryCatalog.xml
> >>>>
> >>>> with tests for JSONiq. I don't remember of the top of my head what is
> >>>> needed
> >>>> to do that, but maybe you can find out by looking at it (or somebody
> >>>> else on
> >>>> the list could provide some more guidance :) ).
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Till
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6 Jun 2016, at 13:14, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks Till. I have implemented the runtime for objects[1], but I am
> >>>>> not
> >>>>> sure of the implementation though it is working and the Object is
> >>>>> printed
> >>>>> in the console from the XMLSerializer class. I think this
> >>>>> implementation
> >>>>> needs improvements and testing. I would like to know how/where to
> write
> >>>>> test classes for the implementation. Also please let me know if the
> >>>>> implementation is correct.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/51
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yours sincerely,
> >>>>> Riyafa
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 3 June 2016 at 03:43, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Riyafa,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think that the sample that I pointed you to might not have been
> the
> >>>>>> best
> >>>>>> one as it depends on methods that are available in superclasses that
> >>>>>> do
> >>>>>> common work for the node constructors.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The top level contract for the evaluators is IScalarEvaluator and
> that
> >>>>>> only
> >>>>>> has one method
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     void evaluate(IFrameTupleReference tuple, IPointable result)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> which takes in a IFrameTupleReference (that provides a value for
> each
> >>>>>> variable in the tuple) and an IPointable that should point to the
> >>>>>> (scalar)
> >>>>>> result after evaluation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The abstract class AbstractTaggedValueArgumentScalarEvaluator
> factors
> >>>>>> out
> >>>>>> some common code for the common pattern that most of our evaluators
> >>>>>> follow:
> >>>>>> 1) pass n IScalarEvaluator to the constructor
> >>>>>> 2) evaluate each of those (argument) scalar evaluators on each
> >>>>>>    IFrameTupleReference that is passed to an evaluate call to get n
> >>>>>> result
> >>>>>>    values for each tuple
> >>>>>> 3) pass those n values (stored in a TaggedValuePointable array) on
> to
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>    simpler evaluate-method that is declared in
> >>>>>>    AbstractTaggedValueArgumentScalarEvaluator and implemented in the
> >>>>>>    subclasses.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The AbstractNodeConstructorScalarEvaluator then refines this even
> more
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>> nodes, but I think that that's not helpful for our object (or array)
> >>>>>> constructors as we e.g. don't consider using dictionaries for those
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does this help/make sense?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>> Till
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2 Jun 2016, at 7:22, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi again,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sorry about my ignorance. On attempting to implement the
> >>>>>>> ObjectNodeConstructorScalarEvaluator I have started wondering about
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> arguments passed to the method constructNode--I am not sure how I
> >>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>> find out what would be passed as arguments for the method in
> >>>>>>> ObjectNodeConstructorScalarEvaluator. Can I assume key and value
> pair
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> be passed as the TaggedValuePointable[] argument? Or where is this
> >>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>> used and how can I find out about the arguments? I have also tried
> >>>>>>> debugging to no avail. Again sorry about the ignorance. I read the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> paper[1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> and still couldn't get a grasp of what's happening (I will read
> again
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> see if I could figure it out)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2806941
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thank you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yours sincerely,
> >>>>>>> Riyafa
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2 June 2016 at 10:43, Riyafa Abdul Hameed
> >>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> When attempting to implement runtime operators for Object
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> implementation,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have come across the following issues:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    - Should there be a ConstructorScalarEvaluator for
> >>>>>>>> PairConstructor?
> >>>>>>>>    - Should I be checking if the keys are unique in the
> >>>>>>>>    ObjectNodeConstructorScalarEvaluator?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yours sincerely,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Riyafa
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Riyafa Abdul Hameed
> >>>>>>>> Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>>> <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>>> <http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf> <
> http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
> >>>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Riyafa Abdul Hameed
> >>>>>>> Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <
> http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>> <http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa
> >
> >>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Riyafa Abdul Hameed
> >>>>> Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Email: [email protected]
> >>>>> Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/
> >
> >>>>> <http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
> >>>>> <http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Riyafa Abdul Hameed
Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa

Email: [email protected]
Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
<http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf>  <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
<http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>

Reply via email to