Hi Riyafa,
I think that it’s fine to add a new value for the Object union to the
ASTTag.
The grammar in the specification describes the syntax of the language,
but it
is up to the implementation to decide how to represent this internally.
Please go ahead and create that tag for the new AST node.
Cheers,
Till
On 15 Jul 2016, at 8:24, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote:
Hi,
On attempting to create a separate constructor for SimpleObjectUnion I
have
come across the following issues:
- Since there's no separate ValueTag for this SimpleObjectUnion
constructor, it is not possible to call a separate translate method
when
this constructor is encountered.
- A new ValueTag for the constructor cannot be created since the
specification[1] doesn't mention about such a constructor.
Am I to proceed creating this new SimpleObjectUnion constructor? If so
any
suggestions on how it could be done?
[1]
http://jsoniq.org/docs/JSONiqExtensionToXQuery/html-single/index.html#section-json-value-construction
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Riyafa
--
Riyafa Abdul Hameed
Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
Email: [email protected]
Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
<http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
<http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
