Hi Ian and Preston,

I would be really grateful if you can look into my previous email in which
I suggested few possible alternatives for the REST API implementation and
kindly give your opinions on that.

Thanks and Regards,

*Erandi Ganepola*
Undergraduate
BSc. Management and Information Technology (IT Sp.)
University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka

<https://www.linkedin.com/in/erandiganepola/>
<https://github.com/erandiganepola>   <https://twitter.com/erandiganepola>

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Erandi Ganepola <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Ian and Preston,
>
> As we discussed, I went through the AsterixDB's REST API implementation.
> They have written the REST API from scratch using servlet basics [1]. What
> I feel is that it won't be efficient to put such effort to write servlets
> from scratch since we have more easy to use, yet stable implementations
> like jersey [2]. Therefore, my opinion is that using jersey[2] will make
> the VXQuery REST API implementation much easier and easily understandable.
>
> However, I'm fine to continue on the REST server implementation with any
> of those two methods (pure servlet based or Jersey & JAX-RS based). Please
> let me know your opinion on these two methods and which method you think
> will be better.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/tree/master/asterixd
> b/asterix-app/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/api/http/server
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fasterixdb%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2Fasterixdb%2Fasterix-app%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fasterix%2Fapi%2Fhttp%2Fserver&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGUlYltQj2h-sheau2X44kyNc0O7g>
> [2] https://jersey.java.net
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fjersey.java.net&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGnWT2V5YQbw8EuNfRlHPkxgNQ3uQ>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> *Erandi Ganepola*
> Undergraduate
> BSc. Management and Information Technology (IT Sp.)
> University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka
>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/erandiganepola/>
> <https://github.com/erandiganepola>   <https://twitter.com/erandiganepola>
>

Reply via email to