Hey, Had a short chat with Matt - he said he hasn’t committer rights anymore. But he filed a PR: https://github.com/GraphChi/graphchi-java/pull/12 <https://github.com/GraphChi/graphchi-java/pull/12>
His comment was: "But, if you search for "license" in the repo, you'll find that a bunch of the files already have apache 2 notices, so assuming the whole thing is apache 2 seems reasonable. (https://github.com/GraphChi/graphchi-java/search?q=license <https://github.com/GraphChi/graphchi-java/search?q=license>)" And hopes someone with maintain rights will merge. Cheers, —Alex > On 25. Oct 2021, at 16:59, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > please don't be discouraged ... actually not getting a release by Justin is > actually considered a measure for being a real podling ;-) > > Some questions I think you could simply respond to the way you do ... in the > raphchi-java the main pom doesn't seem to have a license setting. A lot of > files have Apache headers, but not all. There are still a lot of files > without any real header. > > If the maintainer clearly states all is Apache, that should be ok for us. > > Chris > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Bertty Contreras <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Oktober 2021 14:06 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: GraphChi-Java License > > Hi folks, > > > I added the code because the archifact has the license apache, I never look > the code looking for the license :/, sorry for that. > > I think if we don't get any answer during the next few days, we just remove > the code from the main branch until we get an answer. Also the repository > looks dead :/ I don't have hope to have a reply from the authors. > > Best regards, > Bertty > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:03 AM Alexander Alten <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I already contacted the maintainer via LinkedIn :) I’ll update you on >> the outcome. >> >> Cheers, >> —Alex >> >>> On 25. Oct 2021, at 10:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> According to the GraphChi Java pom, the license seems to be Apache >> License v2. >>> >>> >> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/graphchi/graphchi-java_2.11/0.2.2/g >> raphchi-java_2.11-0.2.2.pom >>> >>> IMHO, we can move forward with Wayang release, and we have a clear >> license definition in the pom. In the mean time, we can ask to >> GraphChi Java guys to be clearer on their GitHub. >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 25/10/2021 10:35, Zoi Kaoudi wrote: >>>> If this is really blocking the release, why not removing it from >>>> the >> supported platforms? >>>> Best >>>> -- >>>> Zoi >>>> Στις Δευτέρα, 25 Οκτωβρίου 2021, 09:15:12 π.μ. CEST, ο χρήστης >> Alexander Alten <[email protected]> έγραψε: >>>> Address not found >>>> Your message wasn't delivered to <>[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]> because the address couldn't be found, or is unable >> to receive mail. >>>> Hmm … >>>>> On 25. Oct 2021, at 09:14, Alexander Alten <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Heya Matt, >>>>> >>>>> I’m writing on behalf of the Apache Wayang project >>>>> (wayang.apache.org >> <http://wayang.apache.org/>). We use graphchi-java in our project, but >> since graphchi-java does not have any licenses in the repo we’d ask if >> you could put a license to the project? >>>>> Here’s the release thread: >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/202110.mbo >> x/browser >> < >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/202110.mbo >> x/browser >>> >>>>> >>>>> Would be awesome if you could help here! We can’t release Apache >> Wayang since the license is unclear, which blocks us. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, stay safe, >>>>> —Alex >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> Alexander Alten >>>>> PPMC Apache Wayang >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> @apachewayang >>>>> >>>> >> >>
