Hi Alex,

Thank you for your prompt reply!

If we need to support multiple versions, my feeling is that it is difficult
to do within a single branch, as code duplication may arise due to
the modules dependencies. So maybe we need a different strategy to support
it like 1 branch/version or something similar.

Sure, I'll also add a comment in GitHub to discuss further.

Regards,
Dimitris

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 9:57 AM Alexander Alten <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dimitris,
>
> Great, thank you!
>
> For Scala - we support multiple versions, depends on Spark.  Not sure
> about if we should deprecate older Scala versions, and if so we’d need to
> display a message that we do so in upcoming releases. And yes, I’d be in
> favor to move /code to a clean maven structure. Just my opinion ;)
>
> We don’t have a Jira, we work with GutHub issues. Can you please add
> comments to the referenced issue? Would be great!
>
> Thank you,
>  —Alex
>
> —
> Alexander Alten
> PPMC Apache Wayang
> [email protected]
>
> @apachewayang
>
> > On 2. Jun 2023, at 08:47, Dimitris Theodosakis <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi *! :)
> >
> > I have removed GraphChi dep from everywhere and now I am working on the
> > code restructure.
> >
> > I'd just like to ask a bit about the task of moving code from */code/* to
> > the usual maven structure.
> >
> > I saw there are multiple versions of scala etc and there are some
> > duplicated packages (1 per version) in some cases that can lead to code
> > duplication. Also I saw here:
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/apache/incubator-wayang/issues/283&source=gmail-imap&ust=1686293319000000&usg=AOvVaw3dYGUtLkaKPXDLyup8XJ-1
> the discussion about
> > the old version and the decommissioning. So should I proceed by removing
> > the old version?
> >
> > Also, is there any JIRA ticket for this task?
>
>
> --
> databloom AI, Inc.
>
> 3401 N. MIAMI AVE. STE 230
> 33127 Miami, Florida
> United States
>
>
> --  Please consider the environment before printing this
> email --
>
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> The content of this message is confidential. If you
> have received it by mistake, please inform us by an email reply and then
> delete the message. It is forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal
> the contents of this message to anyone. The integrity and security of this
> email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will
> not be held liable for any damage caused by the message.
>
>

Reply via email to