>On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:21:41 +0200, Alexandro Colorado
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> * Layout: the page overall lacks focus.  It's not clearl where one
>>> should look, at least beyond the green central rectangle.  Hence,
>>> the bottom, including Mission Statement, etc., all compete with
>>> each other.
>> I am not a great fan of Mission statement. Mission statements are
>> usually put on fancy english and is not what users look. They are
>> usually delegated to the 'about us' page on common sites.
>
>I think the mission statement is and has been the worst thing on the
>front page for the last four years. However, I seem to remember Louis
>arguing that it had to be there, for political reasons. I hope this is
>my long-term memory playing up.
>
There were indeed political considerations.  I'm not committed to it
being there now.  As I metioned before, the MS was a big effort on the
part of the community and when we did take it off for a while there was
a fair amount of complaint.

But let's see it off for a test.  If lots of complaints, we can do what
we did last time: put it back.

Louis
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to