Hi Louis, On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:59:50AM -0800, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > >This may be uglier than Matthew's original. The top and bottom sections > >certainly are. But I maintain it's clearer. > >http://www.darwinwars.com/lunatic/bugs/machete.html > > > It is clearer; unbalanced, but that can be adjusted, eg, by rearranging > some things.
I also like this approach more than the three-column layout. Rearrangement is neccessary, but this is detail-work. > I'm just not sure that it can be done.... It can be done. See my other post and prove of concept: http://de.openoffice.org/testdir/zuwendungen.html Althoug the generation of the bar is not avoided with this approach, it is not displayed. So no changes to the SC-framework necessary. As the site is still generated in a regular way, there is no problem with statication either. http://native-lang.openoffice.org/ is the prove that the generation of the navbar-code can be avoided as well. Native-lang doesn't hide the navbar. It is not generated in this case. http://hu.openoffice.org/ shows that you can put a replacement into the left column. -> No technical restrictions. ciao Christian -- NP: Raging Speedhorn - Random Acts Of Violence --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
