On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 09:19 -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 08:47 -0800, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > > > >>Hi > >> > >> > >>>It appears that your assumption is not correct. This is what I get from > >>>the page source: > >>> > >>><form name="form"> > >>> <select name="site" size=1 > >> > >>onChange="javascript:formHandler()"> > >> > >>> <option value="">Project</option> > >> > >>Okay. Well, with the new page, I think if we can avoid javascript, that > >>would be best, too. > >> > >>Cheers > >>Louis > > > > > > I agree this would be best. I have lost the thread so could you please > > repeat the list of the latest examples or point me to the right message? > > Ger and Louis...I don't quite understand why this is happening. The > download page itself has a non-JS option which the the use should see > if JS in NOT enabled. So...I'm wondering what these non-JS folks are > seeing. Myabe their browsers don't honor the <noscript> tag? > > >
Sure you do. Please go to website > index.html and fix it. It has nothing to do with downloading but everything to do with the user experience. -- Documentation Co-Lead PLEASE - keep list traffic on the list. Email sent directly to me may be ignored utterly. "Dinna meddle wi' things ye ken nuthin' aboot!" J.Herriot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
