Quoting ":murb: [maarten brouwers]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
I think it makes a good contrast. The image of the gulls carring the box is NOT
very professional since it looks too simple and square.
Well, I must say I've not worked my pants of for this image, and no it is not finnished... but it was in no way there to stay for the final, it's a placeholder.
In my opinion I preffer a more human touch related to OpenOffice.org, not just a
cartoonish -- abstract logo. I am more inclined for human pictures, similar to
the ubuntu approach, Unbuntu is about the people not about the bits-n-bytes.
Ubuntu(http://www.ubuntulinux.org/login.jpeg)
Is something I think this community hasn't got and still play around with
vectors and pallettes.
What I think is the problem with adding more human pictures is that people tend to reflect themselfes to the persons... if I see a business man in a suit, it 'll probably scare me, if I see a blonde semi nude diva, I'll think what is this for adolescent joke, if I see childeren I associate it to some organisation organising things for childeren, not at all with a office suite... and imho a great difficulty when you want to use images, though I have to admit Ubuntu (it's my second boot) has done a rather nice job...
But my point is that such photo may say too many words, more than intended.
g.,
Maarten
Yes I agree that we can assume this scenario to happen, if we detect it then we
should be able to solve it. However this is my experience, and not my
assumptions, that 'live pictures' work better than graphics.
-- Alexandro Colorado Co-Leader of OpenOffice.org Spanish http://es.openoffice.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
