How about this: Let's let Emily's design have a fair shot. Give her a similar place to work, to work out all the code.
Then we hold a vote right here, on the website list. Not a committee. A vote.
That is not throwing away your design. That is giving Emily's design, which it
appears, many people on the website list prefer, a fair chance. This would
directly address many of the issues I and others have raised. This is something
we can do right now, to address everyone's concerns. It would include the people
who feel their work is not valued, and it would include you, who fear another
committee.
Does that sound like a solution to everyone?
Yes, +1
Seriously considering Emily's design is not the same as throwing away Maarten's design.
If we don't seriously consider Emily's design, I think we as a group are not doing our job.
Even implementing one design as the home page does not mean we can't (or shouldn't) continue to consider further improvements, possibly even including replacing one new design with another.
Jean
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
