Miikka Leskinen wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 16:23:47 +0100, "John McCreesh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Miikka Leskinen wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:04:51 +0400, "Louis Suarez-Potts"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
NX wrote:
On the /product2/ pages, could you please change "Reqts" to
"Requirements"?
It looks a lot better that way.
If I change it to 'Requirements' the line 'folds' on my 1024x768
display... I'm open to suggestions for another title though.
John
I had the same desire as NX, and left it as is. No imagination on my
part, I guess. But how about : Reqs. It's what people not in the UK
usually use, afaik; at leat those who speak English.
John,
<acronym title="Requirements">Reqs</acronym>
Regards,
Miikka Leskinen
So, instead of:
<li><a href="reqts.html">Reqts</a></li>
I do:
<li><a href="reqts.html"><acronym
title="Requirements">Reqs</acronym></a></li>
? How does that work?
Yes.
This is how you mark up all acronyms or abbreviations that appear on the
page the first time. :)
<acronym> is one that you read as it's written (like NATO) and <abbr> is
one that is spelled out (like Y.M.C.A or EU).
How it works depends on the browser or user agent. At least in Mozilla,
when you hover the text with your mouse, a tooltip is displayed that
shows the "title" text.
It's semantic markup, and it's required for this so-called
"standards-compliant" coding.
I'm hoping to see all this in the upcoming style guide! That'll probably
shed some more light.
Cool. Now changed. Many thanks!
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
