Hi one more question
why website use %, in big display it doesn't look so good, text is so
long and it is hard to read.
for example the news will look better:
content { width: 900px; padding: 0 0 160px 0; clear: both; display:
block; font-size: 1em; } maybe center it as well.
I know there is issue on other sites after that and in header as well
but i will prefer px to defined the sizes than percent in content.


On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Ivan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Maarten,
>
>  I'm against using the header of the current site on the new why page
>  for the following reasons:
>  - its height is too large, especially considering the small amount of
>  space given to the text
>  - the formats/layout of the current header is not compatible with
>  why.openoffice.org's header, especially its navigation
>  - for design reasons - the header would not match the rest of the
>  design of why.openoffice.org
>
>  The new stylesheet has broken the design somewhat, but it should be
>  fairly straightforward to fix. I could attempt some basic fixes, but I
>  don't have access or that much spare time these days (assignment hell)
>  - once I am on holiday at the end of June, I will be able to devote
>  more time to this. It would be great to get this launched before/with
>  OOo 3, and if others are willing to work towards this, I will happily
>  put the time into it.
>
>  - Ivan.
>
>
>
>  On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:07 PM, :murb: [maarten brouwers] <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Hi Ivan, and Andre (you were the designer right, of the new why page?),
>  >
>  >  I think we should strive for better integration of the why page and the
>  >  other pages (at least include the header for the why pages as well). Maybe
>  >  the menu could be hidden. But increased style consistency would improve
>  >  our image when it comes to professionality. Although I'm quite amazed by
>  >  the posibilities of using CSS+HTML for such original design (I've seen the
>  >  version before the redesign that looked much better)... I'm also concerned
>  >  about the larger picture. I think that if we upload a new why page design,
>  >  the primary design element, the header, should be there.
>  >
>  >  g.,
>  >
>  >  Maarten
>  >
>  >  > The why.openoffice.org page has already been redesigned but there are
>  >  CSS issues that need working through. The address is
>  >  > http://marketing.openoffice.org/tryouts/Why.OpenOffice.org/en/index.html
>  >  Most of the oddities have been introduced by the new design and should
>  >  be reasonably simple to fix (e.g. setting display:none to the
>  >  > #minitabs div to get rid of the tabs). Maybe you could help with that?
>  >  >
>  >  > To save webpages and CSS files, just go File >> Save As in your
>  >  > browser. Even better is the Web Developer extension for Firefox - an
>  >  extremely useful plugin - it will show you all the stylesheets being
>  >  used by a single page (CSS >> View CSS) and you can save them
>  >  > individually from there. You can get the extension from:
>  >  > http://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/60
>  >  >
>  >  > - Ivan.
>  >  >
>  >  > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Michal Svatý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  >> Hi
>  >  >>  Yes all of links bold.
>  >  >>   it is posible to download html source of websites and CSS.
>  >  >>   I would like to redesign why openoffice is there any wiki where I
>  >  >>  could Post proposials.
>  >  >>  On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Ivan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  >> wrote:
>  >  >>  > I guess they could be made a little bit bigger and the current page
>  >  >>  >  could be made bold (I wouldn't make all of them bold though)...
>  >  what do others think?
>  >  >>  >
>  >  >>  >
>  >  >>  >  On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:03 AM, Michal Svatý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  >> wrote:
>  >  >>  >  > The link in menu on the top should be bold and litle bit bigger i
>  >  >> think
>  >  >>  >  >
>  >  >>  >  > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>  >
>  >  >>  >  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>  >  additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>  >
>  >  >>  >
>  >  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>  >  additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
>  >  unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to