On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Clayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/13/10 23:43, duchessbmjb55 wrote: > >> BLibrestez55 created an Apache License to legally have the freedom to use >> the content of OpenOffice.org pages according to the license. In case >> BLibrestez55 is contributing to such a page, BLibrestez55 contributions >> are >> covered by this licensing terms. >> Authors who want to share their work under a public license are encouraged >> to join this declaration >> >> Sections or single pages of this wiki are covered by certain licenses. If >> a >> licence notice is displayed at a given wiki page, you may use the content >> of >> this page according to the license. In case you are contributing to such a >> page, your contribution is covered by this licensing terms. >> Authors who want to share their work under a public license are encouraged >> to join this declaration >> Retrieved from >> "http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights"; >> > > > The style, format, and all content created by BLibrestez55 is confusing and > illogical. No one can understand what is being created... no one can > associate it with anything at all to do with OOo... in any form. > > The License page was incorrectly named, and incorrectly formatted. We have > several license declarations on the Wiki (eg PDL, CC-By etc), and a new one > is fine, but it needs to be consistent. > > The platform integration page you (duchessbmjb55) linked in your previous > reply to makes no sense at all. > > Basically, at this point, every single page created by BLibrestez55 is of > no apparent value to anyone, and in my opinion should be removed from the > Wiki. > > duchessbmjb55... are you the same user as BLibrestez55? No offence to duchessbmjb55 and BLibrestez55, but they behave like robots to me in some ways. Felix.
