+1. We should focus on the standard DSL like Vue. This is a good start to let us put burden down and traveling light :)
Hanks Zhang <[email protected]>于2017年10月27日 周五13:25写道： > OK, that's a good idea. > > The issue is created. [WEEX-90] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WEEX-90 > > Regards, Hanks > > 2017-10-27 13:08 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Dong <[email protected]>: > > > +1. Totally agree. And I think we can also file a JIRA issue to track the > > progress. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jonathan Dong > > > > On 26 Oct 2017, 3:05 PM +0800, Adam Feng <[email protected]>, wrote: > > +1， I suggest removing all the other documents about ".we" except the 2 > > documents you mentioned, let’s speed up the migration. > > > > Thanks. > > Adam Feng > > > > On 26 Oct 2017, 2:04 PM +0800, Hanks Zhang <[email protected]>, > wrote: > > Weex DSL 1.0 (.we) front-end framework is inspired by Vue.js 1.0. Since > > Weex supports the official Vue.js 2.0 in v0.10.0 [1] at 2017-02-17, the > > ".we" framework is deprecated. In order to optimize the performance, > > stability, and package size, this legacy framework should be removed from > > the WeexSDK. > > > > I suggest removing the ".we" framework in the 2018 January release of > > WeexSDK. > > > > For the projects who are still using the ".we" framework, you can read > the > > "Migration From .we Framework" [2] and "The Syntax Difference Between .we > > and .vue" [3] documents to help you migrate your ".we" project to Vue.js > > 2.0 project. But those documents only have Chinese version. > > > > [1] https://github.com/alibaba/weex/releases/tag/v0.10.0 > > [2] http://weex-project.io/cn/references/migration/ > > migration-from-weex.html > > [3] http://weex-project.io/cn/references/migration/difference.html > > > > Best Regards, Hanks > > >
