How's it going？ We need to release a version as soon as Yoga is removed. Thanks. Adam Feng
On 12 Oct 2017, 10:37 PM +0800, 申远 <[email protected]>, wrote: > flex-grow is already supported by flex shorthand, and it’s possible to > support flex-shrink in later version. > While, flex-basis is the same as main size which is supported already except > for percent value. I think support percent unit is a huge, duplicate and > unnecessary work for most CSS style, after all I am trying to achieve an > elegant implementation of CSS, excluding dummy, heavy, duplicate part of CSS. > But It makes sense that flex-basis should support and only support percent > value. For baseline, I think if iOS Framework is able to pass ascent, > descent, half-leading, top and bottom to layout engine, layout engine itself > has no problem to manipulate these values. > > > 在 2017年10月12日，17:16，xing zhang <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > Should we consider about layout percent unit, flex-shrink, flex-grow, > > flexBasis, and baseline in align-Items ? > > > > 2017-10-12 16:54 GMT+08:00 申远 <[email protected]>: > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I’m considering replacing Facebook/Yoga to a new layout system based on > > > Google/Flexbox due to Facebook’s additional patent issue. Besides, this > > > new > > > layout system will provide some new css style like order, etc. > > > > > > Any advise for the new layout system? > > > > > > PS: I need some advise about the name of the layout system. >
