+1

I checked the following issue:
* LICENSE is good.
* No binary file found in the source.
* I can build the binary from the source code

> 在 17 Sep 2018,09:54,方曦(千之) <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> +1
> 
> I checked:
> - LICENSE file looks good
> - NOTICE is ok
> - Can build from source by using `scripts/build_from_source.sh`
> - Git tag and hash are correct
> 
>> 在 2018年9月16日,23:51,Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 写道:
>> 
>> We need more vote for it.
>> PPMC Please take some time to verify the kit.
>> 
>> Willem Jiang
>> 
>> Twitter: willemjiang
>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:21 PM 申远 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> I checked the following issue:
>>> * LICENSE is good.
>>> * No binary file found in the source.
>>> * I can build the binary from the source code
>>> 
>>>> 在 2018年9月10日,12:04,Hanks Zhang <[email protected]> 写道:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Weex Community,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm calling this vote to release Apache Weex (Incubating) version 0.19.0.
>>>> 
>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex/commits/0.19.0-rc4
>>>> (88caa7fb95a4f8bae6bf3fa53fbd07aa9f496e80)
>>>> 
>>>> The source code artifacts can be found at:
>>>> 
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/weex/0.19.0/RC4/apache-weex-incubating-0.19.0-RC4-src.tar.gz
>>>> 
>>>> The SHA-512 checksum for apache-weex-incubating-0.19.0-RC4-src.tar.gz:
>>>> 
>>>> E41BB93D 26BCAB55 F39BF11B 91649221 92A56671 9D076C1A 60182569 E3F29D05
>>>> 026F73CC
>>>> D09B4F31 2E3012AD A3B00599 B647CD36 E7E0DD8A 19A9D0B3 362C9FFD
>>>> 
>>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key: 4FD8BC09C7E9DB81, which can be
>>>> found in the keys file:
>>>> 
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/weex/KEYS
>>>> 
>>>> Release note about this version:
>>>> 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WEEX/issues/WEEX-464
>>>> 
>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>> 
>>>> Please vote on releasing this RC.
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why)
> 

Reply via email to