Hi,

I just got myself admin access, and made the WEEX confluence space viewable
for anonymous users.  (IE you don't have to log in any more to see the
contents.)

Now I can give you admin access if you can tell me the name of your
confluence account.

Best Regards,
Myrle

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 5:13 AM 申远 <[email protected]> wrote:

> It seems like a great tool, how do apply for admin right?
>
> > 在 2019年1月25日,08:05,Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 写道:
> >
> > +1 to use the Confluence for the design proposal discussion.
> > FYI, we just open a whitelist to the user to have the write access
> > right to avoid the spam.
> > You can add the user here with below link[1], if you have the admin
> right.
> >
> > [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/spacepermissions.action?key=WEEX
> >
> >
> > Willem Jiang
> >
> > Twitter: willemjiang
> > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 6:53 PM Myrle Krantz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:09 AM 申远 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> There are two types of document for weex now
> >>> API/FAQ documents,  which we hosted it in another git repos.
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex-site/ <
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-weex-site/>
> >>> System design documents, which is the case happening here.
> >>>
> >>> There is no suitable place to write system design documents now. Is
> there
> >>> any advice or where will other Apache project host their system design
> >>> documents.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Everyone makes their own decisions, but many projects use Confluence for
> >> this purpose.  There are draw.io and Gliffy integrations which can
> both be
> >> used to collaboratively edit design proposals.
> >>
> >> For example: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT
> >>
> >> You already have: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WEEX but
> the
> >> permissions are very restrictive.
> >>
> >> Would this be useful to you?  Should we look into making the WEEX
> >> confluence space a bit more open?
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Myrle
>
>

Reply via email to