I think y'all are making *excellent* progress. You seem worried about the number of committers, and I'm glad you're keeping an eye on that issue, but for me it wouldn't be a graduation blocker. Community building isn't something you really "finish" before you leave the incubator.
As to listing the members of the PPMC, keep in mind that that incubator page will no longer be relevant to you when you graduate. You may want to find a different location for the information already. But this would not block you from graduating. You've successfully done three releases. (With three different release managers! Good job!) I think that is also enough to demonstrate graduation readiness on that aspect. You're right that you need to continue to work on keeping your communication on the list. But I do think you've improved, and you've certainly demonstrated that you understand why you need it. I am concerned about the trademark issues we've already discussed. I want to see you at least make some progress on that before you graduate. Right now that's the only thing I see stopping you from graduating. Others may not share my opinion that this is a graduation blocker. Almost all of your PMC members are subscribed to the private list, which is very good. But one person is not (fkysly). You'll want to try to resolve that before you go to graduation. On the other hand, you have three people subscribed to your private list who don't belong there. I'm guessing these are your inactive mentors. This is an easy issue to resolve. The list moderators should unsubscribe them. If you need help, let me know. I may be missing something. I hope the other mentors chime in. But on the whole, you're in really good shape. Congratulations on having a healthy project community! Best Regards, Myrle On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 4:54 AM 申远 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, there > > It took me a few hours to evaluate the maturity for Weex according to The > Apache Project Maturity Model ( > http://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html > ), > it seems like there is still a big improvement space for Weex. The detail > is listed below: > Document issueReleaseRE50 > > The release process is documented and repeatable to the extent that someone > new to the project is able to independently generate the complete set of > artifacts required for a release. > > We should list the Apache Release procedure clearly in the document. > QualityQU30 > > The project provides a well-documented, secure and private channel to > report security issues, along with a documented way of responding to them. > > Again, we should list the report channel clearly in the document. > CommunityCO50 > > The way in which contributors can be granted more rights such as commit > access or decision power is clearly documented and is the same for all > contributors. > > Still, we need to list some basic requirement to be a committers. > Consensus BuildingCS10 > > The project maintains a public list of its contributors who have decision > power -- the project's PMC (Project Management Committee) consists of those > contributors. > > The PPMC & Committer is listed in in the weex status page > <http://incubator.apache.org/projects/weex.html>, I think adding a link to > weex status page in our document is enough. > CS20 > > Decisions are made by consensus among PMC members and are documented on the > project's main communications channel. Community opinions are taken into > account but the PMC has the final word if needed. > > Though we follow the normal Apache consensus building and voting procedure, > but we should make it clear in our document. > Long time issueCommunity > > The community is meritocratic and over time aims to give more rights and > responsibilities to contributors who add value to the project. > > The active committer of Weex is not enough, we need get more people > involved, and find more contributors and committers from weex users. > Consensus building > > All "important" discussions happen asynchronously in written form on the > project's main communications channel. Offline, face-to-face or private > discussions that affect the project are also documented on that channel. > > We are getting better at this part, but not enough. > Release > > We may need more release. > > Guys, what do you think of ? > > Best Regards, > YorkShen > > 申远 >
