> > Maybe [1] should also be in your list. > Already added to the list, thanks.
Best Regards, YorkShen 申远 任 跃兵 <[email protected]> 于2019年11月13日周三 下午8:08写道： > Agree not to rename. > > Maybe [1] should also be in your list. > When we use command weex platform add android or weex platform add iOS, > the code generated in the platform is from [1]. > And it looks like [1] nobody has maintained it. > > [1] https://github.com/weex-templates > > 在 2019/11/8 下午5:19，“申远”<[email protected]> 写入: > > Agreed, there is no silver bullet, either way will cost us months of > time, > at least. > > Best Regards, > YorkShen > > 申远 > > > 王 思波 <[email protected]> 于2019年11月8日周五 下午2:48写道： > > > Renaming weex is not recommended, as you are worried about, it is > likely > > to lose many users. > > ________________________________ > > 发件人: 申远 <[email protected]> > > 发送时间: 2019年11月7日 12:01 > > 收件人: dev <[email protected]> > > 主题: [DISCUSS] Weex branding issues > > > > Hi, community. > > > > I just write down a list about projects may violate the trademark of > Weex. > > Feel free to append yours. > > > > Based my understanding, Weex must product a podling name search > before > > graduation: > > > > - We could rename Weex to some other name, so that there is no > need to > > solve the branding issues at all. The cost is that we may lose > the brand > > and reputation we built for years. > > - We could also convince the project owners in the list to rename > their > > project or donate to ASF so that they could continue use the > trademark > > of > > Weex. Either way, it will costs us lots of time, several months at > > least. > > > > I am not sure which is the best way. > > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WEEX/Branding+issues > > > > Best Regards, > > YorkShen > > > > 申远 > > > > >
