There does not seem to be much (if any) advantage of using a Gem to
hold the common Whimsy code.

There are some disadvantages:
- testing changes to the library code is harder
- Gem has to be generated, uploaded and deployed
- having the Gem as well as the source code on the same system is
confusing as they may differ

I think it would be much simpler to reference the library code using a
relative RUBYLIB definition.

This will mean some changes in order to provide version tags, but
those need to be done anyway as the code currently assumes SVN is
being used.

Reply via email to